Mentimeter Assessment Tools Functionality Review

I need a concise written essay to post graduate level that critically reviews Mentimeter, looking solely at its functionality, with particular attention on the platform’s assessment tools. To ground the analysis, please engage directly with my live Mentimeter environment and organise your observations around the “Sections” and the PICRAT framework. Your essay should: • Demonstrate first-hand use of the assessment features (quiz, poll, ranking, scales, etc.) • Evaluate how smoothly each tool works for both presenter and participant, noting any obstacles or standout strengths. • Comment on the reliability of scoring, speed of result generation and how feedback is displayed to learners. • Reference the PICRAT and Sections dimensions when discussing the learner experience and pedagogical value. Target length is 1,200–1,500 words, written in clear academic English. Cite any external sources in APA 7th. I will provide access links and section labels once the project starts; please keep any screenshots or data captured strictly for this review.