Product Owners / QA Engineer / Business Analyst Needed for Hands-On Evaluation of ReqLens AI Platform

I’m looking for an experienced Product Owner, Business Analyst or QA Engineer to conduct a hands-on professional evaluation of ReqLens (reqlens.com), an AI-powered requirement-intelligence and software-delivery platform. You will work with a set of sample software requirements and use ReqLens to analyze and elaborate them. The objective is to assess whether ReqLens can improve requirement quality, identify gaps and risks, and reduce the effort required to produce structured, test-ready requirements.

What you will do

• Review the provided software requirements using your normal professional approach • Use ReqLens to analyze and elaborate the same requirements • Review the generated acceptance criteria, user journeys, dependencies, risks, coverage gaps, and other relevant outputs • Where applicable, review generated test scenarios and test cases • Identify anything ReqLens missed, incorrectly interpreted, or unnecessarily generated • Compare the ReqLens-assisted workflow with your normal manual approach • Provide honest feedback on output quality, usability, and usefulness Deliverables • Completed evaluation using the provided requirements • Overall ReqLens quality rating from 1–5 • List of important gaps or issues you identified in the generated output • Approximate time you would normally spend completing the same work manually • Approximate time spent using ReqLens • Short written feedback explaining what was useful, what needs improvement, and whether you would consider using ReqLens in your professional work Who we are looking for You should actively work with software requirements and have professional experience as a QA Engineer, Business Analyst, Product Owner, or similar software-delivery role. Experience identifying requirement gaps, dependencies, risks, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test coverage is particularly valuable. This is a paid product evaluation. We are specifically looking for critical and honest professional feedback. Positive feedback is not expected or required.